Scene inside of JFrame

5 Message(s) by 3 Author(s) originally posted in 3d java

From: Misterysword

Date: Thursday, April 19, 2007

Hi all!! I have got a JAVA3D application

1. {application program}.

	2. {function application}.

that I show it in a JFrame.
So, everything is correct.

--->This schem is correct:

class program3D extends JFrame{

public program3D(){ }

public BranchGroup createSceneGraph(){ }

public static void main ( String arg[] )
{
new program3D();
}
}

_______________________________________________________________________
The problem is when I want to draw the scene inside of JPanel, and
then, this JPanel put inside of JFrame.

--->THE PROBLEM:The scene isn't seen !!!

class program3D extends JPanel{

public program3D(){ }

public BranchGroup createSceneGraph(){ }

public static void main ( String arg[] )
{
JFrame window=new JFrame("Main");
window.setLayout( new BorderLayout() );
window.getContentPane().add( new program3D(),
BorderLayout.CENTER); //PROBLEM

window.setSize(500,500);
window.setVisible(true);
}
}

Regards!

From: =?iso-8859-1?q?In=E1cio_Ferrarini?=

Date: Friday, April 20, 2007

Hi there.

I=B4ve never added a JFrame inside another.
Try changing program3d to a JPanel or a Canvas and then try to add it
to a JFrame.

See you,
- In=E1cio Ferrarini.

wrote in message:

Hi all!! I have got a JAVA3D application that I show it in a JFrame.
So, everything is correct.
--->This schem is correct:
class program3D extends JFrame{
public program3D(){ }
public BranchGroup createSceneGraph(){ }
public static void main ( String arg[] )
{
new program3D();
}
}
_______________________________________________________________________
The problem is when I want to draw the scene inside of JPanel, and
then, this JPanel put inside of JFrame.
--->THE PROBLEM:The scene isn't seen !!!
class program3D extends JPanel{
public program3D(){ }
public BranchGroup createSceneGraph(){ }
public static void main ( String arg[] )
{
JFrame window=3Dnew JFrame("Main");
window.setLayout( new BorderLayout() );
window.getContentPane().add( new program3D(),
BorderLayout.CENTER); //PROBLEM
window.setSize(500,500);
window.setVisible(true);
}
}

> Regards!

From: Misterysword

Date: Saturday, April 21, 2007

Hi.
I want to add a JPanel inside of a JFrame, but in this case: the scene
isn't seen.This is the problem.

See you soon

From: Alexander Gran

Date: Saturday, April 21, 2007

Misterysword@xxxxxxxxxxx schrieb:

Hi all!! I have got a JAVA3D application that I show it in a JFrame.
So, everything is correct.
The problem is when I want to draw the scene inside of JPanel, and
then, this JPanel put inside of JFrame.

I have a JAVA3d scene in a canvas, in a JPanel, in a JinteralFrame in a
JDesktopPane in a JFrame, and it works. So I suspect the bug

<programming> An unwanted and unintended property of a program
	or piece of hardware, especially one that causes it to
	malfunction.  Antonym of {feature}.  E.g. "There's a bug in
	the editor: it writes things out backward."  The
	identification and removal of bugs in a program is called
	"{debugging}".

	Admiral {Grace Hopper} (an early computing pioneer better
	known for inventing {COBOL}) liked to tell a story in which a
	technician solved a {glitch} in the {Harvard Mark II machine}
	by pulling an actual insect out from between the contacts of
	one of its relays, and she subsequently promulgated {bug} in
	its hackish sense as a joke about the incident (though, as she
	was careful to admit, she was not there when it happened).
	For many years the logbook associated with the incident and
	the actual bug in question (a moth) sat in a display case at
	the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC).  The entire story,
	with a picture of the logbook and the moth taped into it, is
	recorded in the "Annals of the History of Computing", Vol. 3,
	No. 3 (July 1981), pp. 285--286.

	The text of the log entry (from September 9, 1947), reads
	"1545 Relay #70 Panel F (moth) in relay.  First actual case of
	bug being found".  This wording establishes that the term was
	already in use at the time in its current specific sense - and
	Hopper herself reports that the term "bug" was regularly
	applied to problems in radar electronics during WWII.

	Indeed, the use of "bug" to mean an industrial defect was
	already established in Thomas Edison's time, and a more
	specific and rather modern use can be found in an electrical
	handbook from 1896 ("Hawkin's New Catechism of Electricity",
	Theo. Audel & Co.)  which says: "The term "bug" is used to a
	limited extent to designate any fault or trouble in the
	connections or working of electric apparatus."  It further
	notes that the term is "said to have originated in
	{quadruplex} telegraphy and have been transferred to all
	electric apparatus."

	The latter observation may explain a common folk etymology of
	the term; that it came from telephone company usage, in which
	"bugs in a telephone cable" were blamed for noisy lines.
	Though this derivation seems to be mistaken, it may well be a
	distorted memory of a joke first current among *telegraph*
	operators more than a century ago!

	Actually, use of "bug" in the general sense of a disruptive
	event goes back to Shakespeare!  In the first edition of
	Samuel Johnson's dictionary one meaning of "bug" is "A
	frightful object; a walking spectre"; this is traced to
	"bugbear", a Welsh term for a variety of mythological monster
	which (to complete the circle) has recently been reintroduced
	into the popular lexicon through fantasy {role-playing games}.

	In any case, in jargon the word almost never refers to
	insects.  Here is a plausible conversation that never actually
	happened:

	"There is a bug in this ant farm!"

	"What do you mean?  I don't see any ants in it."

	"That's the bug."

	[There has been a widespread myth that the original bug was
	moved to the Smithsonian, and an earlier version of this entry
	so asserted.  A correspondent who thought to check discovered
	that the bug was not there.  While investigating this in late
	1990, your editor discovered that the NSWC still had the bug,
	but had unsuccessfully tried to get the Smithsonian to accept
	it - and that the present curator of their History of
	American Technology Museum didn't know this and agreed that it
	would make a worthwhile exhibit.  It was moved to the
	Smithsonian in mid-1991, but due to space and money
	constraints has not yet been exhibited.  Thus, the process of
	investigating the original-computer-bug bug fixed it in an
	entirely unexpected way, by making the myth true!  - ESR]

	[{Jargon File}]

	(1999-06-29)

somewhere in
your scene setup code.

regards
Alex

--
Some operating systems are called `user friendly',
Linux

<operating system> ("Linus Unix") /li'nuks/ (but see below)
	An implementation of the {Unix} {kernel} originally written
	from scratch with no proprietary code.

	The kernel runs on {Intel} and {Alpha} hardware in the general
	release, with {SPARC}, {PowerPC}, {MIPS}, {ARM}, {Amiga},
	{Atari}, and {SGI} in active development.  The SPARC, PowerPC,
	ARM, {PowerMAC} - {OSF}, and 68k ports all support {shells},
	{X} and {networking}.  The Intel and SPARC versions have
	reliable {symmetric multiprocessing}.

	Work on the kernel is coordinated by Linus Torvalds, who holds
	the copyright on a large part of it.  The rest of the
	copyright is held by a large number of other contributors (or
	their employers).  Regardless of the copyright ownerships, the
	kernel as a whole is available under the {GNU} {General Public
	License}.  The GNU project supports Linux as its kernel until
	the research {Hurd} kernel is completed.

	This kernel would be no use without {application programs}.
	The GNU project has provided large numbers of quality tools,
	and together with other {public domain} software it is a rich
	Unix environment.  A compilation of the Linux kernel and these
	tools is known as a Linux distribution.  Compatibility modules
	and/or {emulators} exist for dozens of other computing
	environments.

	The kernel version numbers are significant: the odd numbered
	series (e.g. 1.3.xx) is the development (or beta) kernel which
	evolves very quickly.  Stable (or release) kernels have even
	major version numbers (e.g. 1.2.xx).

	There is a lot of commercial support for and use of Linux,
	both by hardware companies such as {Digital}, {IBM}, and
	{Apple} and numerous smaller network and integration
	specialists.  There are many commercially supported
	distributions which are generally entirely under the GPL.  At
	least one distribution vendor guarantees {Posix} compliance.
	Linux is particularly popular for {Internet Service
	Providers}, and there are ports to both parallel
	supercomputers and {embedded} {microcontrollers}.  {Debian} is
	one popular {open source} distribution.

	The pronunciation of "Linux" has been a matter of much debate.
	Many, including Torvalds, insist on the short I pronunciation
	/li'nuks/ because "Linus" has an /ee/ sound in Swedish
	(Linus's family is part of Finland's 6% ethnic-Swedish
	minority) and Linus considers English short /i/ to be closer
	to /ee/ than English long /i:/ dipthong.  This is consistent
	with the short I in words like "linen".  This doesn't stop
	others demanding a long I /li:'nuks/ following the english
	pronunciation of "Linus" and "minus".  Others say /li'niks/
	following {Minix}, which Torvalds was working on before Linux.

	{More on pronunciation
	(http://www.foldoc.org/pub/linux-pronunciation)}.

	{LinuxHQ (http://www.linuxhq.com/)}.  {slashdot
	(http://slashdot.org/)}.  {freshmeat (http://freshmeat.net/)}.
	{Woven Goods (http://www.fokus.gmd.de/linux/)}.  {Linux
	Gazette (http://www.ssc.com/lg)}.

	{funet Linux Archive (ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/Linux)}, {US
	mirror (ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/)}, {UK Mirror
	(ftp://sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk/packages/Linux/)}.

	(2000-06-09)

however is `expert friendly'.
Encrypted Mails welcome. Send spam

1. <messaging> (From Hormel's Spiced Ham, via the Monty Python
	"Spam" song) To post irrelevant or inappropriate messages to
	one or more {Usenet} {newsgroups}, {mailing lists}, or other
	messaging system in deliberate or accidental violation of
	{netiquette}.

	It is possible to spam a newsgroup with one well- (or ill-)
	planned message, e.g. asking "What do you think of abortion?"
	on soc.women.  This can be done by {cross-post}ing, e.g. any
	message which is crossposted to alt.rush-limbaugh and
	alt.politics.homosexuality will almost inevitably spam both
	groups.  (Compare {troll} and {flame bait}).

	Posting a message to a significant proportion of all
	newsgroups is a sure way to spam Usenet and become an object
	of almost universal hatred.  Canter and Siegel spammed the net
	with their Green card post.

	If you see an article which you think is a deliberate spam, DO
	NOT post a {follow-up} - doing so will only contribute to the
	general annoyance.  Send a polite message to the poster by
	private e-mail and CC it to "postmaster" at the same address.
	Bear in mind that the posting's origin might have been forged
	or the apparent sender's account might have been used by
	someone else without his permission.

	The word was coined as the winning entry in a 1937 competition
	to choose a name for Hormel Foods Corporation's "spiced meat"
	(now officially known as "SPAM luncheon meat").  Correspondant
	Bob White claims the modern use of the term predates Monty
	Python by at least ten years.  He cites an editor for the
	Dallas Times Herald describing Public Relations as "throwing a
	can of spam into an electric fan just to see if any of it
	would stick to the unwary passersby."

	{Usenet} newsgroup: {news:news.admin.net-abuse}.

	See also {netiquette}.

	2. (A narrowing of sense 1, above) To indiscriminately send
	large amounts of unsolicited {e-mail} meant to promote a
	product or service.  Spam in this sense is sort of like the
	electronic equivalent of junk mail sent to "Occupant".

	In the 1990s, with the rise in commercial awareness of the
	net, there are actually scumbags who offer spamming as a
	"service" to companies wishing to advertise on the net.  They
	do this by mailing to collections of {e-mail} addresses,
	Usenet news, or mailing lists.  Such practises have caused
	outrage and aggressive reaction by many net users against the
	individuals concerned.

	3. (Apparently a generalisation of sense 2, above) To abuse
	any network service or tool by for promotional purposes.

	"AltaVista is an {index}, not a promotional tool.  Attempts to
	fill it with promotional material lower the value of the index
	for everyone.  [...] We will disallow {URL} submissions from
	those who spam the index.  In extreme cases, we will exclude
	all their pages from the index." -- {Altavista}.

	4. <jargon, programming> To crash a program by overrunning a
	fixed-size {buffer} with excessively large input data.

	See also {buffer overflow}, {overrun screw}, {smash the stack}.

	5. <chat, games> (A narrowing of sense 1, above) To flood any
	{chat} forum or {Internet game} with purposefully annoying
	text or macros.  Compare {Scrolling}.

	(2003-09-21)

to toZodiac@xxxxxxxxxxx, please.
PGP-Key at http://www.grans.eu/misc/pgpkey.asc | Key-ID: 0x6D7DD291

From: Misterysword

Date: Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Do you show me an example code??? For this: scene inside a JPanel, and
JPanel inside a JFrame.

Thanks!!

Next Message: to erase points cloud and to draw it.