Sagewire Logo

Choosing a EAR or WAR deployment

3 Message(s) by 2 Author(s) originally posted in cfml getting started


From: Naim.Beg Date:   Monday, October 22, 2007
Is there an advantage of using an EAR deployment versus a WAR deployment of
CFMX8 on JRun4? (I know the EAR is recommended)

On our current servers (Windows 2003, IIS 6 JRun4) we deployed CFMX7 as a WAR.
(We are using JRun clustering for Cold Fusion if that makes any difference).
We'll be migrating our ColdFusion apps to CFMX8 in which we'll be getting new
servers (again Windows 2003 IIS6). I plan to install JRun4, then updater 6 or 7
because we'll be using multiple JRun instances for other services.

Are there advantages in using the EAR over the WAR deployment? If not, I'd
prefer to continue to use the WAR deployment because it's a configuration that
we are used to working with...


From: ksmith Date:   Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Yes, the recommended ear deployment will be setup properly, include the RDS ear, etc. Deploying using the ear method is what occurs with the standalone version of CF/CFMX. Why not do it?


From: Naim.Beg Date:   Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Per conversation with another JRun / Cold Fusion Engineer,
Quote:
"If you are talking about EAR vs WAR deployment, there is no difference. You
can use what you are most comfortable with. EAR is just a wrapper over WAR file
in this case since there are no EJB-JAR files."

Since we've been using the WAR deployment for previous versions, I'll
deploy Cold Fusion 8 the same way.

Thanks.



Next Message: How to use the structure on my insert statement.


Blogs related to Choosing a EAR or WAR deployment

Choosing a EAR or WAR deployment
Is there an advantage of using an EAR deployment versus a WAR deployment of CFMX8 on JRun4? (I know the EAR is recommended) On our current servers (Windows 2003, IIS 6 JRun4) we deployed CFMX7 as a WAR. (We are using JRun clustering for ...


Programming | Sports | Autos

copyright 2006
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional