nested application.CFM not working properly in CFMX6.1?
2 Message(s) by 2 Author(s) originally posted in cold fusion
| From: security man |
Date: Wednesday, November 08, 2006
|
I've an
interesting situation.
Say I've 10 users on a CFMX
server serving 10 websites.
the first 6 usernames are all similar.
someuser
someuse1
someuse2
someuse3
someuse4
someuse5
otheruser
yetanother
andanother
yesanother
OK, in all the fully unique names at the end a person have have an
application .CFM work 100% in folders, subfolders, etc. On users
someuse* the application.CFM ONLY works in the
domain root, if you put
an application.CFM in a folder, lets all it onlineeditor in
d:\someuser\domain\onelineeditor\application.CFM won't read, it goes
back to the application.CFM at d:\someuser\domain\application.CFM
Anyone see this before, is there a workaround, it is really causing me
some pain.
Thanks,
John
| From: Joe Zack - CFHow.com |
Date: Sunday, November 19, 2006
|
I know that there can only be one application with a CFAPPLICATION
tag
that isn't named, and that having more than one CFAPPLICATION tag with
the same name can really
screw up a lot of stuff, so I'd suggest
taking a look at that.
Here's a
link to a article I'm working on about this specific issue:
http://www.cfhow.com/blog/index.php/archives/application-file-part-1/
wrote in message:
I have an interesting situation.
Say I've 10 users on a CFMX server serving 10 websites.
the first 6 usernames are all similar.
someuser
someuse1
someuse2
someuse3
someuse4
someuse5
otheruser
yetanother
andanother
yesanother
OK, in all the fully unique names at the end a person have have an
application.CFM work 100% in folders, subfolders, etc. On users
someuse* the application.CFM ONLY works in the domain root, if you put
an application.CFM in a folder, lets all it onlineeditor in
d:\someuser\domain\onelineeditor\application.CFM won't read, it goes
back to the application.CFM at d:\someuser\domain\application.CFM
Anyone see this before, is there a workaround, it is really causing me
some pain.
Thanks,
John
Next Message: values in drop down box