<operating system> /deb'ee`n/, *not* /deeb'ee`n/ The
	non-profit volunteer organisation responsible for Debian
	{GNU}/{Linux} and Debian {GNU}/{Hurd}.  Debian's {Linux}
	distribution is dedicated to free and {open source} software;
	the main goal of the distribution is to ensure that one can
	download and install a fully-functional {operating system}
	that is completely adherent to the Debian Free Software
	Guidelines (DFSG).

	Debian was begun in August 1993 by Ian Murdock, and was
	sponsored by the {Free Software Foundation} from November 1994
	to November 1995.  The name Debian is a contraction of DEB(ra)
	and IAN Murdock.

	Debian's packaging system (dpkg) is similar to other popular
	packaging systems like {RPM}.  There are over 2200 packages of
	precompiled software available in the main (free) section of
	the Debian 2.1 distribution alone -- this is what sets Debian
	apart from many other Linux distributions.  The high quality
	and huge number of official packages (most Debian systems'
	/usr/local/ remains empty -- almost everything most Linux
	users want is officially packaged) are what draw many people
	to use Debian.

	Another unique aspect to the Debian project is the open
	development; pre-releases are made available from Day 1 and if
	anyone wishes to become a Debian developer, all that is needed
	is proof of identification and a signed {PGP} or {GPG} key.
	There are over 400 Debian developers all around the world --
	many developers have never met face-to-face, and most
	development talks take place on the many {mailing lists} and
	the {IRC} network.

	{Home (http://www.debian.org/)}.

	{Debian Linux archives (ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian)}.

	(1999-02-23)

1. <storage> Integrated Drive Electronics, see {Advanced
	Technology Attachment}.

	2. <programming, tool> {integrated development environment}.

	3. <company> {Interactive Development Environments}.

	(2002-04-14)

1. A discrepancy between a computed, observed, or measured
	value or condition and the true, specified, or theoretically
	correct value or condition.

	2. <programming> A mental mistake made by a programmer that
	may result in a program {fault}.

	3. (verb) What a program does when it stops as result of a
	programming error.

	(2000-03-28)

In {object-oriented programming} sending a message to an
	{object} (to invoke a {method}) is equivalent to calling a
	{procedure} in traditional programming languages, except that
	the actual code executed may only be selected at run time
	depending on the {class} of the object.  Thus, in response to
	the message "drawSelf", the method code invoked would be
	different if the target object were a circle or a square.

	(1995-02-16)

<language, programming> (Or "source", or rarely "source
	language") The form in which a computer program is written by
	the programmer.  Source code is written in some formal
	programming language which can be compiled automatically into
	{object code} or {machine code} or executed by an
	{interpreter}.

	(1995-01-05)

<character> (Or "ctrl", "^") One (or a pair) of {modifier
	keys} found on all modern {keyboards}.  If the control key is
	held down while pressing and releasing certain other keys then
	a "{control character}" is generated, e.g. holding control and
	hitting "A" generates control-A ({ASCII} code 1).  The ASCII
	code for the control character is generally 64 less than that
	for the unmodified character.

	The control key does not generate any character on its own but
	most modern keyboards and {operating systems} allow a program
	to tell whether each of the individual keys on the keyboard
	(including modifier keys) is pressed at any time.

	Control characters mostly have some kind of "non-printing"
	effect on the output such as ringing the bell (Control-G) or
	advancing to the next line (Control-J).  Most have alternative
	names suggesting these functions (Bell, Line Feed, etc.).

	See {ASCII character table}.

	(1997-07-10)

<programming> (See below for synonyms) A data structure for
	storing items which are to be accessed in last-in first-out
	order.

	The operations on a stack are to create a new stack, to "push"
	a new item onto the top of a stack and to "pop" the top item
	off.  Error conditions are raised by attempts to pop an empty
	stack or to push an item onto a stack which has no room for
	further items (because of its implementation).

	Most processors include support for stacks in their
	{instruction set architectures}.  Perhaps the most common use
	of stacks is to store {subroutine} arguments and return
	addresses.  This is usually supported at the {machine code}
	level either directly by "jump to subroutine" and "return from
	subroutine" instructions or by {auto-increment} and
	auto-decrement {addressing modes}, or both.  These allow a
	contiguous area of memory to be set aside for use as a stack
	and use either a special-purpose {register} or a general
	purpose register, chosen by the user, as a {stack pointer}.

	The use of a stack allows subroutines to be {recursive} since
	each call can have its own calling context, represented by a
	stack frame or {activation record}.  There are many other
	uses.  The programming language {Forth} uses a data stack in
	place of variables when possible.

	Although a stack may be considered an {object} by users,
	implementations of the object and its access details differ.
	For example, a stack may be either ascending (top of stack is
	at highest address) or descending.  It may also be "full" (the
	stack pointer points at the top of stack) or "empty" (the
	stack pointer points just past the top of stack, where the
	next element would be pushed).  The full/empty terminology is
	used in the {Acorn Risc Machine} and possibly elsewhere.

	In a list-based or {functional language}, a stack might be
	implemented as a {linked list} where a new stack is an empty
	list, push adds a new element to the head of the list and pop
	splits the list into its head (the popped element) and tail
	(the stack in its modified form).

	At {MIT}, {pdl} used to be a more common synonym for stack,
	and this may still be true.  {Knuth} ("The Art of Computer
	Programming", second edition, vol. 1, p. 236) says:

	  Many people who realised the importance of stacks and queues
	  independently have given other names to these structures:
	  stacks have been called push-down lists, reversion storages,
	  cellars, dumps, nesting stores, piles, last-in first-out
	  ("LIFO") lists, and even yo-yo lists!

	[{Jargon File}]

	(1995-04-10)

<tool, cryptography> (PGP) A high security {RSA} {public-key
	encryption} application for {MS-DOS}, {Unix}, {VAX/VMS}, and
	other computers.  It was written by {Philip R. Zimmermann}
	<pkz@acm.org> of Phil's Pretty Good(tm) Software and later
	augmented by a cast of thousands, especially including Hal
	Finney, Branko Lankester, and Peter Gutmann.

	PGP was distributed as "{guerrilla freeware}".  The authors
	don't mind if it is distributed widely, just don't ask Philip
	Zimmermann to send you a copy.  PGP uses a {public-key
	encryption} {algorithm} claimed by US patent #4,405,829.  The
	exclusive rights to this patent are held by a California
	company called {Public Key Partners}, and you may be
	infringing this patent if you use PGP in the USA.  This is
	explained in the PGP User's Guide, Volume II.

	PGP allows people to exchange files or messages with {privacy}
	and {authentication}.  Privacy and authentication are provided
	without managing the keys associated with conventional
	cryptographic software.  No secure channels are needed to
	exchange keys between users, which makes PGP much easier to
	use.  This is because PGP is based on {public-key
	cryptography}.

	PGP encrypts data using the {International Data Encryption
	Algorithm} with a random {session key}, and uses the {RSA}
	algorithm to encrypt the session key.

	In December 1994 Philip Zimmermann faced prosecution for
	"exporting" PGP out of the United States but in January 1996
	the US Goverment dropped the case.  A US law prohibits the
	export of {encryption} software out of the country.
	Zimmermann did not do this, but the US government hoped to
	establish the proposition that posting an encryption program
	on a {BBS} or on the {Internet} constitutes exporting it - in
	effect, stretching export control into domestic censorship.
	If the government had won it would have had a chilling effect
	on the free flow of information on the global network, as well
	as on everyone's privacy from government snooping.

	{FAQ (ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/mp/mpj/getpgp.asc)}.  {UK FTP
	(ftp://src.doc.ic.ac.uk/packages/pgp/)}.  {USA FTP
	(http://web.mit.edu/network/pgp-form.html)}.
	{(http://www.pegasus.esprit.ec.org/people/arne/pgp.html)}.

	{Justice Dept. announcement
	(http://www.eff.org/pub/Alerts/usatty_pgp_011196.announce)}.

	["Protect Your Privacy: A Guide for PGP Users", William
	Stallings, Prentice-Hall, ISBN 0-13-185596-4].

	(1996-04-07)